What evidence allows us to say

A passing test describes what was exercised, under certain conditions.

A hash lets us compare content against a reference.

A deployment confirms that a change was applied. Its effect still needs to be observed.

Every piece of evidence has a scope. Rigor means keeping that scope visible when drawing a conclusion.

I try to ask three questions: what did we observe, under what conditions, and what remains unknown?

Trust grows when those answers stay attached to the claim.

Even when a broader statement would feel more comfortable.